Transport Canada Bilateral Agreement Easa

The FAA toured the Boeing 737 MAX on November 18, 2020 after 20 months of hibernation after the second fatal aircraft type accident in March 2019 in Ethiopia. However, the grounding phase appears to have undermined the FAA`s global status, with several aviation authorities, including TC and the European Aviation Safety Agency (EEAS) of the European Union, announcing that they would conduct independent audits of the 737 MAX. Previously, the FAA was, through bilateral agreements, the designated certification authority for commercial aircraft built in the United States. NOTE the respective commitments of the parties under bilateral, regional and multilateral agreements on civil aviation safety and environmental compatibility, maintenance procedures as part of the Aviation Safety Promotion Agreement between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Canada Technical Agreement on Airworthiness Recognition and Environmental Authorization of Civil Aeronautical Products under the Bilateral Protocol for the Promotion of Civil Aviation Products. Israel`s Consult agreements and agreements that hold Canada with other countries, regions or governing bodies. Canada-EU Agreement on Civil Aviation Safety A similar agreement between Canada and the United States was signed in 2000 and had a positive impact on the Canadian civil aviation industry, leading to greater harmonization of safety requirements. CONSIDERING that each party has established, through a long practice of technical exchanges and bilateral agreements between Canada and members of the European Community (EC), that the other party`s standards and systems for airworthiness and certification or environmental acceptance of civil aviation products are equivalent to its own, in order to make an agreement possible, 4.3. Contracting parties may request the assistance of the civil aviation authority of a third country in carrying out its supervisory and supervisory functions if an authorization has been rendered or renewed by either party, by an agreement or formal agreement with that third country. For aircraft that have been accepted by the ANAC “Type” certificate, special attention must be paid to the acceptable certification base for any design change. For example, a major design change approved by ANAC must correspond to subsection C because 21 and at least CAR 21.73 (b) (3). This means that the design change is not only authorized at ANAC, but must also have been certified, validated, validated or accepted by EASA, FAA or Transport Canada through an internationally recognized bilateral (and related TIP) agreement between that state and Brazil.

It is up to the applicant to explain how any changes to the designs, including service bulletins, were accepted under an internationally recognized bilateral agreement with faA, EASA or TCCA and the state in question. It is not the responsibility of the CAA SM to do so. To assist the applicant in this regard, they can access the bilateral agreements by clicking on the corresponding web link below: under the new agreement, the European Aviation Safety Agency (EEAS) will recognize certification of Canadian aviation products and services, allowing the Canadian aviation industry to be much more competitive in the European market.