Estas palabras se suelen usar con agreement. Pincha en una colocación para ver más ejemplos. This Agreement (including all Annexes and Timetables) constitutes the entire Agreement between the Parties. This Agreement supersedes all other agreements or directives, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter of this Agreement, and constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement concluded by the Parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement. Si quieres saber más sobre contratsos anglosajones apúntate ya a la Lista de Espera VIP de nuestro curso Contract Law. Abrimos en enero y las plazas vuelan. Por poder, se puede usar, pero tal vez su eficacia no sea tan amplia en España y otros países similares. Nuestro Derecho no es el Common Law. “Este contrato constituye el contrato completo de las partes en relación con el objeto del mismo”. `This Treaty (including its Annexes and Annexed Documents) shall be the full agreement of the Parties who sign it.` Yes of course.
Under the principle of free procurement, contracting parties may agree on what they wish as long as it is not contrary to the law (i.e. as long as it is not contrary to law or public order). We may translate this term into “full agreement”, “full contract” or “integrity of the agreement”. It is used to make it known that the contract from which it is derived is the only valid one between the parties and that it includes all the provisions and agreements concluded between them concerning its subject matter. In other words, there are no other previous agreements or treaties that could influence or modify the agreement agreed therein and, where appropriate, should not be considered valid. Professor Carrasco (Civil Law Lessons). Law of Contracts and Obligations in General, Ed. Tecnos, p. 150), points out that `this clause does not make it possible to choose the means of interpretation of the document, so that the conduct of negotiation excluded as an interpretative matter is nevertheless prior acts to be dealt with when interpreting the Treaty`. On this blog, we have already talked about these clauses (here: boilerplate clauses in contracts). That is why we will not go too far.
If the parties wish to prevent certain un written events, or even certain documents exchanged for them before the signing of the contract, from having contractual effect, they introduce this clause. It is also used to limit the liability of one of them in the event of false allegations (misrepresentation) on the basis of these allegations. We would simply like to point out that this is a series of very frequent standard clauses, which are normally found at the end of the Treaty and which are intended to settle a number of usual or standardised issues. In the event of a conflict or a different interpretation of the treaty or any of its clauses, a court may refer to the documents or statements exchanged by the parties during the negotiated procedure to attempt to settle the dispute. However, let us not forget that the parties of the Anglo-Saxon countries (England and Wales in particular) have more freedom to get along and, above all, to limit their responsibilities. In our country and in others in our legal environment, these clauses may not be the same. Despite the ending, many of them have great importance, and their formulation is not always easy to understand. .